Covid-19:
Is the Voice of Dissent Getting Louder?
While
politicians
trample all over their own guidelines, leaving the public to wonder at
believing in the lockdown rules and Black Lives Matter protests flouting social distancing
in great numbers, it is not surprising that people are getting angry and
frustrated. A peer on my counselling course informed me that when Arsenal lost
their match, they also lost sight of social distancing and players were hugging
each other. Yet we have been told only groups of six
from different households can mix together and social distancing should still
be observed. It appears the guidelines alter according to different sets of
people.
And
so people are starting to question: is this virus a real threat?
Has this pandemic and all its massive ramifications actually been a false
alarm?
Have
we been lied to by the Government?
While
Boris Johnson refers to Covid-19 as the ‘Deadly Plague’, Chris
Whitty, Chief Medical Officer reassures the illness is mild
for the healthy, if symptomatic at all.
And
what has been the results of the lockdown?
Distrust
within society. Snitch lines.
Isolation of the elderly.
An emerging police state.
Loss of livelihoods. Depression and suicide.
Dependency on state for survival. Poverty.
Excess deaths
(not Covid deaths) due to being deprived of treatment. And what this time last
year most citizens of the UK could never have predicted; voluntary
incarceration.
But
if we start at the very beginning, which is a very good place to start, the
focus needs to be on Imperial College in London from which the rule breaker
Neil Ferguson with his infamous mathematical model
emerges (which was never peer reviewed).
Neil Ferguson
isn’t just known for indulging in a bit of one sided wife swapping. He is also
notorious for talking about animals but he is definitely no Dr Dolittle for an
estimated twelve million animals were slaughtered as a result of his prediction
that up to 150,000 people could die of foot and mouth disease in 2001. There
were, in fact, fewer than 200 deaths. His other accolades include predicting
that up to 150,000 people would die of ‘Mad Cow Disease’ but since 1990, only
178 people in the UK have died of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Then there was his
200 million people would be killed by bird flu claim in 2005. WHO said there
were 78 deaths attributed to this illness. And swine flu which claimed the
lives of 457 people in the UK but the soothsayer of death reckoned the demise
rate to be closer to 65,000 people.
But
this can’t only be about Neil Ferguson and his unreliable deadly predictions.
Or can it? Why did the Government rely on his current model that predicted half
a million deaths in the UK of Covid-19? Especially after his dark crystal ball
failings of the past.
Bring
in Bill Gates and let’s follow the money (hint: there is a lot of it).
Neil
Ferguson is the Acting Consortium Director of Vaccine
Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) based at Imperial
College, London and VIMC is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and
GAVI, The Vaccine Alliance.
If
you haven’t quite felt that needle yet, the Gates foundation has also sponsored
Imperial College with $185 million.
Could
there be a conflict of interest
here with a powerful pharmaceutical agenda?
The global vaccination market is set
to make $59.2 billion; vaccines are a significant source
of income.
With
the Government
also invested in GAVI, have they been protecting our health or protecting their
own interest?
Doctors,
scientists and other experts have come forward to affirm that the government’s
response to the virus is out of proportion to the threat but many have been
censored on platforms such as YouTube and Facebook.
A forensic doctor made it clear that there is no ‘killer’ virus
and that the fatalities he examined in connection with the virus all had
previous illnesses. Prof Knut Wittkowski is a German-American researcher and professor
of epidemiology. He worked for 15 on the Epidemiology of HIV before heading for
20 years the Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at
The Rockefeller University, New York. He says; 'With all respiratory diseases,
the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity. About 80% of the people
need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even
have recognized that they were infected, or they
had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children. So, it’s very
important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get
herd immunity as fast as possible.
We are experiencing all sorts of counterproductive
consequences of not well-thought-through policy
I have been an epidemiologist for 35 years, and I
have been modeling epidemics for 35 years. It’s a pleasure to have the ability
to help people to understand, but it’s a struggle
to get heard.'
Then
we have the manipulation of statistics. Just how many people have died of
Covid-19 really? Professor Karol Sikora,
a senior oncologist, has said that doctors have been putting Covid-19 on death
certificates without proof. He proposed that the Government actually have no
idea of how many deaths are caused by the virus.
CDC
published a report,
offering a real estimate of the overall death rate for covid-19 and the number
is 0.26% whereas World Health Organisation
spiked the fear with a death rate of 3.4%.
So
why have we had to endure such a harsh lockdown with major consequences when
the CDC have estimated the death rate for people under the age of 50 years to
be 1 in 5000 for those with symptoms? And almost all of the individuals who do
die have underlying conditions or other illnesses. In fact, people who are
healthy are more likely to die in a car accident
than Covid-19 (at least in America). Meanwhile, children are more likely to get
struck by lightning
than to die of the virus. And this also shows that Sweden had the lowest
infection rate among children (and they kept their schools open).
Added to
this is the unprofessional
reporting of much of
the media in which to incite panic and fear. From exaggerated claims to embroidered
case fatality rates and the consequent impact of the lockdown. Therefore, not
only have statistics been manipulated, so have the public. This is from a paper prepared by SAGE’s behavioural science
sub-group SPI-B “The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using
hard-hitting emotional messaging. To be effective this must also empower people
by making clear the actions they can take to reduce the threat (11).” The German Interior Ministry accidentally released a document that said the reaction to the virus
was exaggerated, that the danger was no greater than for other viruses and that more
people are dying due to the lockdown than covid-19 (600 physicians
sent a letter to President Trump announcing the lockdowns to be a ‘mass casualty incident’). This is then confirmed by abundant serological studies that suggest the
infection rate is similar to that of the flu.
With all this information available;
is the voice of dissent getting louder? Are people becoming resistant to the
spoon fed narrative?
It might be emerging that thousands of lives have been lost, an economy decimated and a world divided due to an
inflated lie.
Conspiracy thinking or critical
thinking?
How about truth…
