Covid-19: Is the Voice of Dissent Getting Louder?

 

Covid-19: Is the Voice of Dissent Getting Louder?

 

While politicians trample all over their own guidelines, leaving the public to wonder at believing in the lockdown rules and Black Lives Matter protests flouting social distancing in great numbers, it is not surprising that people are getting angry and frustrated. A peer on my counselling course informed me that when Arsenal lost their match, they also lost sight of social distancing and players were hugging each other. Yet we have been told only groups of six from different households can mix together and social distancing should still be observed. It appears the guidelines alter according to different sets of people.

And so people are starting to question: is this virus a real threat? Has this pandemic and all its massive ramifications actually been a false alarm?

Have we been lied to by the Government?

While Boris Johnson refers to Covid-19 as the ‘Deadly Plague’, Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer reassures the illness is mild for the healthy, if symptomatic at all.

And what has been the results of the lockdown?

Distrust within society. Snitch lines. Isolation of the elderly. An emerging police state.  Loss of livelihoods. Depression and suicide. Dependency on state for survival. Poverty. Excess deaths (not Covid deaths) due to being deprived of treatment. And what this time last year most citizens of the UK could never have predicted; voluntary incarceration.

But if we start at the very beginning, which is a very good place to start, the focus needs to be on Imperial College in London from which the rule breaker Neil Ferguson with his infamous mathematical model emerges (which was never peer reviewed). Neil Ferguson isn’t just known for indulging in a bit of one sided wife swapping. He is also notorious for talking about animals but he is definitely no Dr Dolittle for an estimated twelve million animals were slaughtered as a result of his prediction that up to 150,000 people could die of foot and mouth disease in 2001. There were, in fact, fewer than 200 deaths. His other accolades include predicting that up to 150,000 people would die of ‘Mad Cow Disease’ but since 1990, only 178 people in the UK have died of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Then there was his 200 million people would be killed by bird flu claim in 2005. WHO said there were 78 deaths attributed to this illness. And swine flu which claimed the lives of 457 people in the UK but the soothsayer of death reckoned the demise rate to be closer to 65,000 people.

But this can’t only be about Neil Ferguson and his unreliable deadly predictions. Or can it? Why did the Government rely on his current model that predicted half a million deaths in the UK of Covid-19? Especially after his dark crystal ball failings of the past.

Bring in Bill Gates and let’s follow the money (hint: there is a lot of it).

Neil Ferguson is the Acting Consortium Director of Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) based at Imperial College, London and VIMC is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI, The Vaccine Alliance.

If you haven’t quite felt that needle yet, the Gates foundation has also sponsored Imperial College with $185 million.

Could there be a conflict of interest here with a powerful pharmaceutical agenda? The global vaccination market is set to make $59.2 billion; vaccines are a significant source of income.

With the Government also invested in GAVI, have they been protecting our health or protecting their own interest?

Doctors, scientists and other experts have come forward to affirm that the government’s response to the virus is out of proportion to the threat but many have been censored on platforms such as YouTube and Facebook.

 A forensic doctor  made it clear that there is no ‘killer’ virus and that the fatalities he examined in connection with the virus all had previous illnesses. Prof Knut Wittkowski is a German-American researcher and professor of epidemiology. He worked for 15 on the Epidemiology of HIV before heading for 20 years the Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at The Rockefeller University, New York. He says; 'With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity. About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children. So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible.
We are experiencing all sorts of counterproductive consequences of not well-thought-through policy
I have been an epidemiologist for 35 years, and I have been modeling epidemics for 35 years. It’s a pleasure to have the ability to help people to understand, but it’s a struggle to get heard.'

Then we have the manipulation of statistics. Just how many people have died of Covid-19 really? Professor Karol Sikora, a senior oncologist, has said that doctors have been putting Covid-19 on death certificates without proof. He proposed that the Government actually have no idea of how many deaths are caused by the virus.

CDC published a report, offering a real estimate of the overall death rate for covid-19 and the number is 0.26% whereas World Health Organisation spiked the fear with a death rate of 3.4%.

So why have we had to endure such a harsh lockdown with major consequences when the CDC have estimated the death rate for people under the age of 50 years to be 1 in 5000 for those with symptoms? And almost all of the individuals who do die have underlying conditions or other illnesses. In fact, people who are healthy are more likely to die in a car accident than Covid-19 (at least in America). Meanwhile, children are more likely to get struck by lightning than to die of the virus. And this also shows that Sweden had the lowest infection rate among children (and they kept their schools open).

Added to this is the unprofessional reporting of much of the media in which to incite panic and fear. From exaggerated claims to embroidered case fatality rates and the consequent impact of the lockdown. Therefore, not only have statistics been manipulated, so have the public. This is from a paper prepared by SAGE’s behavioural science sub-group SPI-B  “The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging. To be effective this must also empower people by making clear the actions they can take to reduce the threat (11).” The German Interior Ministry accidentally released a document that said the reaction to the virus was exaggerated, that the danger was no greater than for other viruses and that more people are dying due to the lockdown than covid-19 (600 physicians sent a letter to President Trump announcing the lockdowns to be a ‘mass casualty incident’). This is then confirmed by abundant serological studies that suggest the infection rate is similar to that of the flu.

With all this information available; is the voice of dissent getting louder? Are people becoming resistant to the spoon fed narrative?

It might be emerging that thousands of lives have been lost, an economy decimated and a world divided due to an inflated lie.

Conspiracy thinking or critical thinking?

How about truth…